If the characteristic exchange time (that is, the inverse of the exchange rate) and diffusion times are in the same order of magnitude [8] and [24], the ADC decreases upon increasing the diffusion time until a plateau is reached corresponding to exchange equilibrium. To get the water diffusion coefficient is facilitated by a correction procedure that, in turn, can be made sufficiently accurate

selleck chemicals llc if the rate of exchange of magnetization between the two pools is known and provided as the input parameter for the analysis [4], [8] and [37]. That rate has typically been estimated using the Goldman–Shen pulse sequence [38]. This latter strategy has shortcomings the most important of which are that it requires additional (that is, that measure the exchange rate) NMR experiments and that it is model dependent. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new STE pulse sequence that can suppress effects of magnetization exchange, irrespective whether originating from PR-171 cost cross-relaxation or chemical exchange. This is achieved in those experimental situations where one pool (such as that consisting of macromolecules) has a short T2 that the pulse sequence exploits by inserting T2 filters during the longitudinal evolution period. Besides the theoretical analysis, we demonstrate the performance of the

presented method on the well-characterized MYO10 system agarose/water gel system and show that we can obtain the water self-diffusion coefficient directly and free of exchange

artifacts. To the best of our knowledge, the only detailed analysis for cross-relaxation effects in diffusion experiments was given in [12] while chemical exchange effects were treated originally by Kärger [29], [30], [31], [32] and [36] and then modified for including relaxation effects [15] and [16]. In this section, we re-capitulate the solutions presented and demonstrate their formal equivalence. We explicitly treat PGSTE experiments where the longitudinal evolution period (τ2, the delay between the second and third 90° pulse in the conventional experiment) is much longer than the encoding–decoding periods (τ1, the delay between the first and second 90° pulse). Hence, we assume Δ ≈ τ2. The case where these assumptions do not hold is detailed in Appendix A. The 2-site exchange model is introduced in Fig. 1; kf/b,Rf/b and Df/b represent the exchange rates, longitudinal relaxation rates and translational self-diffusion coefficients, respectively for “free” (f) and “bound” (b) states. Keeping the case of water diffusion in mind, the “bound” state refers primarily to exchangeable protons or to cross-relaxing protons that belong to slowly moving macromolecules.