We created replicate cultures with five distinct levels of genetic diversity and monitored them for 16 weeks in both permissive (ambient seawater) and stressful conditions (diluted seawater). The relationship between molecular genetic diversity at presumptive neutral loci and population vulnerability was assessed by AFLP analysis.\n\nResults: Buparlisib cell line Populations with very low genetic diversity demonstrated reduced fitness relative to high diversity populations even under

permissive conditions. Population performance decreased in the stressful environment for all levels of genetic diversity relative to performance in the permissive environment. Twenty percent of the lowest diversity populations went extinct before the end of the study in permissive conditions, whereas 73% of the low diversity lines went extinct in the stressful environment. All high genetic diversity populations persisted for the duration of the study, although population sizes and reproduction ABT-737 mouse were reduced under stressful environmental conditions. Levels of fitness varied more among replicate low diversity populations than among replicate populations with high genetic

diversity. There was a significant correlation between AFLP diversity and population fitness overall; however, AFLP markers performed poorly at detecting modest but consequential losses of genetic diversity. High diversity lines in the stressful environment 432 showed some evidence of relative improvement as the experiment progressed while the low diversity lines did not.\n\nConclusions: The combined effects of reduced average fitness and increased variability contributed to increased extinction rates for very low diversity populations. More modest losses of genetic diversity resulted in measurable decreases in population fitness; AFLP markers did not always detect these selleck inhibitor losses. However when AFLP

markers indicated lost genetic diversity, these losses were associated with reduced population fitness.”
“The potential risk to cetacean species from direct interaction with fisheries was assessed using a screening procedure based on a Productivity Susceptibility Analysis (PSA). The procedure incorporated productivity attributes specific to cetaceans; a measure of data quality to identify areas where information was lacking; a measure of the potential of different fishing gears to capture different cetacean species; and susceptibility attributes designed for scenarios with limited information on species abundance and distribution. The assessment was not temporally or spatially explicit but used examples of static and mobile gears found in Ireland, and much of Europe, to demonstrate the approach. Gillnets targeting demersal species was assessed as the fishery posing greatest potential risk to cetaceans.