Those who failed to match all stimuli were excluded from the stud

Those who failed to match all stimuli were excluded from the study (2 7-year-olds). Reading fluency for experimental Alectinib order words was measured outside the scanner in a self-paced reading-words-aloud task. Reading accuracy and the time from word presentation to next word-initiating button press were recorded. In the scanner, children received movement reduction training whilst watching a funny cartoon. The cartoon was paused when

an MR-compatible video camera recorded excessive movement. This training continued until the participant was lying sufficiently still for several minutes. During the fMRI experiment, participants performed a one-back categorisation task; they pressed a button with their right index finger when the same animal or tool picture (e.g., white cat, black cat) or the same animal or tool word (e.g., CAT, cat) was presented twice PTC124 manufacturer in a row. Each trial

began with a 1.5 s stimulus followed by a 0.8 s fixation screen. With this presentation duration, it is highly unlikely that subjects of any age failed to process word content, since from age 7 years onwards, semantic priming effects occur for briefly presented words (Chapman et al., 1994 and Plaut and Booth, 2000), even when word primes are task irrelevant (Simpson and Foster, 1986 and Simpson and Lorsbach, 1983) or ignored (Ehri, 1976 and Rosinski et al., 1975). Responses were recorded with a Lumitouch button box. Participants were instructed to fixate a central cross at all times, except during word blocks, when the cross was not present. There were 4 runs of 6 min 42 s. Each run consisted of 5 animal picture blocks, 5 tool picture blocks, 5 animal word blocks, 5 tool word blocks and 5 fixation baseline blocks of 16.1 s each (7 trials). Block and stimulus order were randomised with no stimulus repetitions within blocks. Target trials occurred 12 times during each run

– 3 times for each stimulus category. see more Button-press-related motor activation in the brain should not affect any contrasts of interest because (a) responses were infrequent, and (b) matched across conditions. To keep participants motivated, hits and false alarms were shown after each run. After fMRI, children’s reading abilities were measured using the Sight Word Efficiency Subtest of the TOWRE (Torgesen, Wagner, & Rashotte, 1999), a standardized test of reading accuracy and efficiency for pronouncing printed words. Raw scores reflect the number of words on a list that are read accurately within 45 s. MR data were collected with a Siemens TIM Avanto 1.5T scanner, using a 32-channel receive-only head coil. Data from 5 adults was collected without the front part of the coil (leaving 2/3 of the channels). Because this only leads to a lower signal to noise ratio in the orbitofrontal regions it did not affect any regions where an effect was expected, and so the data of these participants was included in the analysis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>