Regarding the overall vaccine efficacies, however, it seems that BCG revaccination confers a similar protection on the two different clinical forms of tuberculosis. An additional 4 years of follow up of children revaccinated with BCG at school age showed that revaccination can offer additional protection, although protection was restricted to Salvador, the site further from the Equator, and confined to a small subgroup of children aged <11 years at vaccination. The trial was funded by grants from the Department of International Development, UK (DFID) and the National Health Foundation,

Brazil (FUNASA). We would like to thank the Health and the Education Secretariat GSK1349572 purchase for the States of Bahia and Amazonas, and for the cities of Salvador and Manaus, the National Programme of Immunisation

and the National Centre for Epidemiology in Brazil (both originally from FUNASA now at the Secretary to Health Surveillance, Minsitry of Health), in particular J.M. Magalhaes Neto, J. Barbosa, M.L. Maia, M. Carvalho and L. Pinto; selleck products to the field team E. Ackerman, I. Cunha, M.H. Rios, F. Praia, J.C. Goes and the members of the vaccination and data collection teams. We are grateful to A.C. Lemos for reviewing discordant cases and Claudio Struchiner, Jose Ueleres, Ricardo Ximenes, Antonio Rufino-Neto for scientific advice and C. Victora, Peter G Smith and Simon Cousens, for their scientific advice. Contributors: L.C.R., M.L.B. were involved in designing the study, supervising field work, data analysis and interpretation and editing the manuscript; S.M.P., S.S.C., M.Y.I. were involved in field work, interpretation of results and editing the manuscript; D.P. contributed to the analysis, interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript; A.A.C., C.S’.A. were involved

in clinical supervision, interpretation of results and editing the manuscript; BG mafosfamide led the analysis, and was involved in the interpretation of results and editing the manuscript. All authors had access to all data in the study and held final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Role of the funding source: Neither of the two funding bodies had any role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of the results or the writing of the report. All authors had full access to the data of the trial (except allocation to intervention or control) at all times. Decisions to publish data of the trial are the shared responsibility of all authors. “
“Anaplasma marginale is a pathogen of cattle in the Order Rickettsiales, causing cyclic anemia and occasionally death. The organism causes severe economic losses in livestock production worldwide [1]. Various strategies have been implemented to develop a vaccine to mitigate the impact of this disease. The first attempt at a vaccine was in the early 1900s, with the isolation of A.