Overall, most studies demonstrate a slow progression of cognitive symptoms in ALS relative to motor decline and show that these cognitive deficits are present early in the course of the disease. Overlapping between ALS and FTD Although ALS #CDK inhibitor randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# and FTD are two different entities, it is now clear that these disorders are neurodegenerative conditions with overlapping clinical and neuropathological features. The overlap is further confirmed by the presence of the ubiquitinated Tar DNA binding protein (TDP-43) inclusions both in FTD patients without Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical tau pathology, as well as in sporadic and familial case of ALS (Neumann et al. 2006; Kwong et al. 2007). Moreover, as will

be described in the next section, ALS patients show an impairment of cerebral regions beyond the motor system, including Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical cortical areas typically involved in FTD and a proportion of ALS patients displays cognitive and behavioral changes that in some instance

reach criteria for FTD Strong and Rosenfeld 2003; (Irwin et al. 2007). Strong et al. (2006) found a pattern of mental change that was indistinguishable from that of FTD in a group of patients with dementia and ALS. In a large study involving 279 ALS patients, 50% manifest cognitive impairment and 15% met criteria for FTD (Ringholz et al. 2005). Murphy et al. (2007) found a spectrum Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical of frontal lobe dysfunction in half of the patients, with five Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical of them (22%) meeting neary criteria for FTD. These studies support the hypothesis of a clinical continuum between ALS and FTD, according to which FTD is an integral component of ALS and can be expected in any ALS patients. The timescale of onset and the pattern of the cognitive symptoms in FTD/ALS are not clear, but reports Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical have suggested that FTD reflects one end of the disease continuum. However, this argument is difficult

to support when considering that some studies have found no meaningful progression of cognitive deficits over time. If cognitive deficit exists, these could affect an assessment in these patients; in general, there is always cognition CYTH4 needed as prerequisite to test cognition. More, BCI could also have problems when deficits exists. To overcome this circularity could be more effective to use a P300 BCI system. The good thing about P300 BCI is that the response itself does not need major load of cognition to perform a P300 ERP (P300 is used in unconscious patients as well and an oddball paradigm should nevertheless work). So if the production of the signal does not need any cognitive load than testing with cognition with BCI is just the same as testing cognition with paper and pencil which is a standardized procedure. The use of BCI in ALS patients with cognitive impairment has already been studied (Iversen et al. 2008a; Perego et al. 2011).