On average, the geometric mean income for study households on Guadalcanal (SBD$1900, 95% confidence limits $1472–$2450) were higher than those on Malaita (SBD$1260, 95% confidence limits $938–$1693). There was no significant relationship between income and location (inland or coastal) in either Province. Although people living in Auki town had slightly higher

incomes than those from out of town, the data were highly variable and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Households on Guadalcanal consumed both salt-fish (P=0.001) and tilapia (P=0.04) more frequently than the households on Malaita, but otherwise the consumption of different types of fish and meat was similar ( Fig. 4). Households in town, in both provinces, Seliciclib ate more tinned fish; however the reasons for this are not easily explained by the data. Although tinned fish are associated with affluence ( Table 3), as described above, these

households did not show up as being significantly more affluent than those further from town. On Guadalcanal, the consumption of tinned fish for households in town was significantly higher than either households with daily or with non-daily access to town (P<0.001) ( Fig. 4), but daily access and non-daily access were not significantly different from each other. In Malaita, where it was only possible to compare within town and daily access, the households in town consumed tinned Selleck ABT 199 fish significantly more frequently than those with daily access (P<0.001) and they consumed tilapia significantly less frequently (P=0.015). In order to examine whether income affected the choice of fish or meat, the data were examined separately for each province and then pooled to examine the patterns across both provinces Thymidine kinase using

rank correlation. Overall, in both provinces, income was significantly positively correlated with marine fish (P=0.035), tinned fish (P=0.005) and meat (P=0.003) ( Table 3). When examined by province, this pattern also held for Guadalcanal (marine fish, P=0.047; tinned fish, P=0.05 and meat, P=0.042). On Malaita, there were strong positive correlations with income and meat (P=0.013) and tinned fish (P=0.011), but the correlation with marine fish was not significant. Instead, low income on Malaita correlated with high consumption of salt-fish (P=0.004). Respondents were asked to rank the fish and meat products that they ate at least occasionally, starting from a rank of ‘1’ as their most preferred to their least preferred ‘4’. They were asked to exclude price in this instance but to consider any other aspect, such as taste. As few people were consuming non-fish products other than chicken, the analysis of preference was restricted to the top four preferences for fish and chicken, a rank higher than ‘4’ was omitted. A number of respondents ranked more than one item equally and so the findings are weighted by this factor.