It should be noted that in the 3-deazaneplanocin A molecular weight Sultanate of Oman, there is no role for the pharmaceutical industry, insurers, and lobby groups in the committee’s decision-making process.

The committee disseminates data and information in letters to public health officials, letters to physicians and through its quarterly newsletter. Members communicate with each other at meetings and via email. Information is shared with NITAGs in other Gulf countries, where most of them already have their own committees. There is no specific training for members per se, but when a new member joins, a detailed discussion and orientation with the Secretary follows about the scope of the committee’s work. In addition, the Secretary regularly circulates updated information to the whole committee. To maintain their level of competence and awareness of current issues, members attend WHO meetings,

national EPI meetings and other health congresses. This enables members to meet other health professionals in their field and to keep abreast of new knowledge. The Sultanate of Oman is a small country, therefore it is difficult to find and maintain a sufficiently large number of experts in immunization and immunization-related fields. There is, for example, only one immunologist in the entire country. The few existing experts work either for the MoH (90%) or for the university (10%). In some cases this results in a lack of sufficient expertise to address specific questions—an Ruxolitinib manufacturer example being that the committee’s health economist is often so busy with other activities that he is not always available for committee work. The Sultanate’s evidence-based decision-making process could be improved by making sure that the committee is updated regularly on immunization issues. To achieve this, the Secretary sends updated information from WHO and other EPI sources to all members, doing his best to ensure they understand and digest the information. This is not always easy to accomplish, GPX6 given the fact that the members are very busy. The Secretary

is investigating ways of overcoming these obstacles. Evidence-based decision-making could also be improved by bringing more expertise onto the committee, either by training existing members or by bringing new members on board. The University, for example, could provide committee members with training in health economics so that they would be able to deal with economic questions at a higher level than at present. Likewise, generalists with specific expertise could be brought in to help the committee with its deliberations, even though they might not be experts in the field. For instance, a statistician could be included on the committee to provide some perspective on economic issues, even if he or she is not an expert in health economics. The author state that they have no conflict of interest.