However,

reproducibility is poor (CV are 45% or higher) when peak perfusion is expressed as a function of baseline [114,133]. Most of the studies exploring PORH reproducibility have been performed on the volar surface of the forearm, and results are conflicting. Reproducibility was excellent (CV from 6% to 22%) when the locations of the laser probes were marked so that exactly the same sites were studied from one day to another [148]. However, reproducibility was only Dorsomorphin molecular weight fair to good (CV around 20%) when the position of the probe was recorded with less precision [2] and decidedly poor when the skin sites were randomly chosen (CV were 40% or higher) [114]. As temperature plays a key role in baseline flux, it is not surprising that homogenizing skin temperature when performing PORH assessed with single-point LDF improved reproducibility on the forearm, especially when data were expressed as a function of baseline. Maintaining skin temperature at 33°C

throughout the recording provided acceptable one-week reproducibility, whether expressed as peak CVC or as a function of baseline (CV were 33% or lower) [117]. However, skin temperature homogenization only partially compensates for spatial variability, as the inter-site reproducibility of simultaneous PORH measurements on the forearm was poor compared with that of full-field techniques [117]. Selleckchem EX-527 Therefore, it is likely that the variation in capillary density between different skin sites is the major source of variability when using single-point Paclitaxel research buy LDF. The use of full-field techniques such as LDI could lessen this variability. However, LDI is not fast enough to accurately assess the kinetics of PORH (which lasts only a few seconds) over large areas, resulting in a potential shift of the recorded peak compared with the peak measured with LDF. However, some groups have successfully used LDI to assess PORH by studying very small areas, scanning up to 20 images/min with good reproducibility (CV ranging between 10% and 15%) [79]. Nevertheless, the major advantage of LDI (spatial resolution over large areas) is lost. Line scanning

LDI may be another way of overcoming this issue. Moreover, the recently developed high frame rate LSCI technique allows continuous assessment of skin perfusion over wide areas, and could combine the advantages of both LDF and LDI [117]. Another issue when comparing protocols that use PORH is the heterogeneity of study designs. Indeed, there is no consensus about the optimum protocol, and a wide variety in the duration of brachial artery occlusion exists, from 1 to 15 minutes, with a positive relationship between post-occlusive hyperemic response and the duration of arterial occlusion [79,145,149]. Occlusion lasting five minutes has been extensively used, probably from analogy with brachial artery flow-mediated dilation methods, a standardized tool used to investigate endothelial function in conduit arteries [23].