From month 4 to year 3, 63 (66%) of the patients with the Δ32

deletion and 264 (52%) of the patients without the deletion had a stable virological response (P=0.02). When the follow-up period was extended (month 4 to year 5), 44 patients (48%) and 168 patients (35%), respectively, were found to have a stable virological response (P=0.01). At year 5, differences were also noted between Δ32/wt and wt/wt patients when patients were categorized according to cART experience: in the cART-naïve subgroup, 51 and 45% of patients, respectively, had a stable response, and in the cART-pretreated subgroup, 46 and 27% of patients, respectively, had a stable response (this difference was significant; PMantel Haentzel=0.02). The percentage of patients with CD4 counts >500 cells/μL did not differ significantly between the Δ32 and wild-type patients; at year 3, 55 and 49% of patients, respectively, had CD4 counts >500 cells/μL Vemurafenib (P=0.26), and at year 5 these percentages were 52 and Maraviroc manufacturer 54%, respectively (P=0.73). After adjustment for confounding factors, the Δ32 deletion was significantly associated with a sustained virological response during the period from 4 months to 5 years post-enrolment

(P=0.04), and was nearly significantly associated with a sustained virological response during the period from 4 months to 3 years post-enrolment (P=0.07) (Table 2). In terms of the immunological response, the Δ32 deletion was not significantly associated with a CD4 count >500 cells/μL at year 3 (P=0.78) or at year 5 (P=0.15). Among 609 HIV-1-infected patients started on a PI-containing regimen, the frequency of patients heterozygous for CCR5 Δ32 was 16%: frequencies were 4% for patients born in Africa and 19% for patients born in Europe, similar to findings of previous studies carried Calpain out in similar populations [12,14,16,17]. The CCR5 Δ32 deletion was associated with a better virological response

to cART up to 3 and 5 years. A better virological response did not translate into a significantly better immunological response at any time during the study. At baseline, patients with the Δ32 deletion were older, had higher CD4 cell counts and had lower HIV RNA measurements than patients without the deletion. This might be explained by the effect of the CCR5 Δ32 deletion on the natural evolution of HIV infection before these patients started cART. Indeed, previous studies have shown that the presence of an allele with CCR5 Δ32 confers delayed progression to HIV-1 disease in the absence of cART [3,4]. Furthermore, the effect of the deletion may have contributed to a possible selection bias [19]. Indeed, the patients who could be included in the genetic bank study were those who had survived from 1997 to 2002, they were younger. This bias limits the interpretation of our results, as only those patients with a better prognosis were included in the study.