For example, C57Bl/6 strains differ significantly and the difference between various B6 substrains are often larger than the differences when

comparing a specific C57Bl/6 with other inbred strains such as B10. In addition, using strains from other colonies means that the mice also differ in epigenetic- and environmental-caused selection. A recent example is the lack of segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) in the Jackson Laboratory animal house as compared with some other animal houses that dramatically affected an IL-17-associated phenotype 14. Another example is the induction of inter-male aggressiveness among non-littermate adult males that, in fact, results in severe arthritis in many mouse strains 15. There is one obvious solution to this problem and that is to

use littermates. This will ensure that not only https://www.selleckchem.com/products/epz-6438.html is the genetic background comparable but also the environment. Another advantage is that the mice do not require full backcrossing, as the difference in genes will be neutralized when littermates are compared although less backcrossing might result in a requirement for increased numbers of mice in the experiments as the variability will increase. The exception for not using littermate GDC-0973 supplier controls is to use mouse strains that can be demonstrated to be genetically identical. However, in these cases the experiments still need to be controlled for environmental factors. Thus, the control and test mice need to be balanced in terms

of cages, age, sex, etc. and the experiments need to be blinded as has recently been highlighted by the new guidelines for reporting animal experiments, the ARRIVE guidelines 16. The suggestions to use littermate controls and to control for linked fragments may raise the threshold for reporting new findings and limit the quantity of unreliable results. The drawback is, of course, that it gives an extra Phospholipase D1 burden of labor, in particular when more complicated modifications are to be studied and sometimes it is simply impractical. That is most likely one reason why scientific journals, including EJI, have not yet implemented this requirement. Given the present explosion of the data and publication pool, which we first enjoy swimming in but soon discover that we cannot keep up with and end up drowning in, it is of particular importance for high-quality journals to set quality standards for reporting data. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no financial or commercial conflicts of interest. The authors are members of the Executive Committee of EJI but it should be noted that the views expressed in this Commentary are the personal views of the authors and do not represent EJI policy.