Additionally, we demonstrated that a combined deletion of both EP

Additionally, we demonstrated that a combined deletion of both EPAC1 and EPAC2 genes inactivated the GEFs for Rap1, whereas a single gene deletion (EPAC1−/− or EPAC2−/−)

alone had no effect (Figures 1G and 1H), showing a synergistic action between EPAC1 and EPAC2 proteins. We next examined whether EPAC null mutation caused developmental changes or alterations in synaptic structures. We compared the overall synaptic protein compositions (Figure 1I), synaptic spines (Figure 1J), and spine densities (Figure 1K) as well as synaptic vesicles (Figure 1L) among genotypes; we discovered A-1210477 clinical trial no abnormalities in EPAC−/− alleles. In contrast to our findings, an earlier study suggested that EPAC2 protein was involved in synaptic remodeling via regulation of spine turnover (Woolfrey et al., 2009). However, this previous work was conducted in the in vitro cultured neurons and thus relevance to the in vivo neuronal functions of endogenous EPAC2 protein is questionable. Additionally, we analyzed the series cryostat brain sections (Figures S1A and S1B, available online) from adult mice. As shown for regions (Figure S1C) including the hippocampus, striatum, and the prefrontal cortex known to MLN0128 express EPAC genes, there

were no structural deficits in EPAC−/− neurons. We next examined whether EPAC null mutation affects functional state of synapses. We used whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from the CA1 pyramidal neurons blind, with direct comparison of littermates derived from heterozygous mating. In this series of the studies, we first analyzed the evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) by stimulation of the Schaffer-collateral fibers. Since the peak

amplitude of EPSCs at a given stimulation varies from slice to slice, we constructed the input-output curves by plotting the normalized EPSCs amplitude against the stimulus intensities. We found that the evoked EPSCs in response to the elevated stimulus intensities were dramatically reduced in EPAC−/− and inducible (IN-EPAC−/−) neurons, compared to controls (Figure 2A, n = 16 recordings/8 mice). We also examined the spontaneous release of glutamate transmitter (Figure 2B) and demonstrated that Rolziracetam the frequency (Figure 2C) but not the mean amplitude (Figure 2D) of the spontaneous EPSCs in EPAC null alleles decreased significantly, compared to the controls (n = 14 recordings/7 mice/group, p < 0.01). In the postsynaptic sites, we analyzed the current-voltage (I-V) relations of the normalized AMPA receptor-mediated ( Figure 2E) and NMDA receptor-mediated ( Figure 2F) EPSCs. We found that neither the voltage dependence nor the reversal potentials of the evoked EPSCs were altered in EPAC−/− neurons (n = 12 recordings/6 mice/group).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>