87 and 45.28%, first and second crops, respectively). The EW, GW and W100 were lower in diseased plants in all hybrids. The mean weight loss in the first season was EW 29.03%, GW 27.83% and W100 17.08%, and the second season was EW 27.75%, GW 25.60% and W100 16.99%. The most affected hybrids with weight loss in the first crop were AG1051 (EW 34.31%, GW 33.05%, W100 19.96%) and BRS 1035 (EW 34.74%,
GW 34.65%, W100 22.31%). In the second crop, were P30F80 (EW 30.72%, GW 30.92%, W100 19.24%), DKB390 (EW 30.61%, GW 29.81%) and 2B710 (W100 19.27%). Corn yield was strongly affected by ASR. “
“Oospore formation of Pseudoperonospora cubensis was investigated in 10 Chinese this website locations: Mohe, Harbin, Changchun, Shenyang, Beijing, Liaocheng, Yinchuan,
Xining, Yangling and Haikou. Oospores were observed in all but Haikou. Oospore viability was monitored from 10 January to 10 July 2009, in Harbin. Percentages of activated oospores increased from 10 April with a peak in late May (14.0% on 25 May 2009), and then decreased. This is in accordance with the usual time of downy mildew appearance in Harbin, 20–30 May. Inoculation tests using the oospores overwintered in Harbin, whether in the greenhouse or outdoors, showed that these were viable, with a disease occurrence of 26.6–95.0%. Oospores overwintering locally could be primary infection sources of downy mildew in cool temperate NVP-BKM120 concentration northern China. “
“Aphanomyces euteiches and Phytophthora medicaginis are two pathogens of seedling and find more mature alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) that are frequently found in the same field sites. In order to investigate possible interactions of these two pathogens, two greenhouse
experiments were conducted on seedling alfalfa from check populations representing the phenotypic classes of dual susceptibility and dual resistance to both pathogens. Seedlings were challenged with multiple inoculum concentrations of A. euteiches and P. medicaginis. Separate real-time PCR assays specific for A. euteiches and P. medicaginis were used to quantify the amount of each pathogen in root tissue. For both pathogens, significantly more pathogen DNA was detected in the susceptible check population Saranac than in the resistant check population WAPH-1 in all treatment combinations. In general, co-inoculation with both A. euteiches and P. medicaginis resulted in significantly reduced amounts of P. medicaginis DNA detected when compared with amounts detected from inoculations with P. medicaginis alone. This relationship was observed for the analysis of bulked plant samples and also for individual plants. Co-infestation by both pathogens did not reduce the quantity of A. euteiches detected. Possible mechanisms responsible for the inhibition of accumulation of P. medicaginis by A. euteiches are discussed.