40 (± 0.27)% in Type I waters and 0.60 (± 0.38)%

in Type II. Consequently, in Type III lakes we observe two broad maxima of the reflectance spectrum Rrs(λ) in the 560–580 nm and 690–720 nm bands, due to the dominance of backscattering over absorption in these bands for the reasons given earlier. A third local reflectance maximum in the ca 650 nm band is also well in evidence in this third group of waters, though only scarcely perceptible in the other two groups. This must also be a result of the relevant relations between the total absorption and the scattering of light in this band. The three types of reflectance spectra Rrs are illustrated in Figure 6; omitted are a few other recorded spectra – indirect, atypical ones, of the kind that inevitably TSA HDAC clinical trial emerge from any conventional classification of nature (see also Ficek et al. 2011). The Type I reflectance spectra are very similar to the reflectance spectra typical of the open waters Epigenetic inhibitor of the Baltic (see Darecki et al., 1995, Kowalczuk et al., 1999, Darecki et al., 2003 and Ficek et al., 2011). Table 2 lists

the positions of the reflectance maxima Rrs(λ) along with other selected properties of the three groups of lakes. The empirical dependence of absorption aCDOM(440 nm) on the spectral reflectance band ratio x = Rrs(570 nm)/Rrs(655 nm) was approximated for the waters of these lakes by the expression ( Ficek et al. 2011): equation(5) aCDOM440nm=3.65x−1.93 with a coefficient of determination of R2 = 0.85. Here we found an appropriate empirical relationship between the coefficient of light absorption by SPM ap(440 nm)

and the reflectance Rrs(800 nm), but only for lake waters of Types I and III in our classification. We present this relationship on Figure 7, described by regression equation 6, with a coefficient of determination of R2 = 0.86. equation(6) ap440nm=235×0.745, where ap(440 nm) – coefficient of light Teicoplanin absorption by SPM, measured in [m−1], x ≡ Rrs(800 nm) – the remote sensing reflectance measured in [sr−1]. For the same lake waters of Types I and III we also established, on the basis of the form of the dependence in Woźniak et al. (2011), the empirical dependence of the total volume absorption coefficient a(440) in these waters for a light wavelength of λ = 440 nm on the spectral reflectance band ratio at selected wavelengths Rrs(490)/Rrs (655) ( equation (7) and Figure 8), with a coefficient of determination of R2 = 0.90: equation(7) a440nm=100.554logx2−1.380logx+0.161, where x = Rrs(490 nm)/Rrs(665 nm). Likewise on Figure 8 the dashed line represents the dependence for Baltic waters taken from Woźniak et al. (2011): this shows that these dependences are similar for low values of absorption a(440), typical of Type I lake waters. The empirical dependence of the scattering coefficient on scattering b   and the reflectance Rrs   was also determined for selected wavelengths in Type I and III lake waters.