4 %. Table 1 Population attributable fractions [PAF%, 95 % confidence intervals (CI), if available] for occupational stress related to cardiovascular diseases in different countries estimated with different methods   Germany Finlanda Swedenb Francec Europe Job strain   M 16 % F 19 % M 6.7 % F 14.7 % 6.5–25.5 %

3.40 %d (CI 1.5–5.4) Proxy EWCSe CYC202 5.23 % (CI 1.49–8.97) 3.85 % (CI 1.06–6.64) 2.86 % (CI 0.75–4.96) 3.65 % (CI 1.00–6.31) 4.46 % (CI 1.26–7.65) ERI 1.2–25.7 %f         Proxy EWCSe 19.5 % (CI −2.51 to 40.82) 17.16 % (CI −2.71 to 37.03) 16.44 % (CI −2.75–35.64) 18.83 % (CI 2.45–40.19) 18.21 % (CI 2.58–39.01) EWCS European Working Conditions Survey aNurminen and Karjalainen (2001), m males, f females, PAF for shift work,

involving work strain bJärvholm et al. (2013), m males, f females cSultan-Taïeb et al. (2011) dKivimäki et al. (2012) eNiedhammer et al. (2013) fBacké et al. (2013) Apart from the differences in methods to estimate the prevalence of job strain (e.g., complete questionnaire or proxy measures) as well as the selection of studies giving information on risk estimates for the association of CVD and job strain, there is another issue that needs to be addressed. LB-100 order within the Karasek model, Alisertib job strain is defined by the presence of high demand combined with low decision latitude. Median cut points are used to define high demand, low control, and job strain. This is arbitrary. Further cutoffs vary depending on the structure of occupations within the population. If one supposes that levels of demand and control differ between countries (Moncada et al. 2010) and given the lack of a population-independent cutoff for job stress, identical answers to the demand and

control scales may be considered as low stress in one country Selleckchem Cobimetinib and as high stress in another country. This point is also mentioned by Niedhammer et al. as possible limitation of their study. But additionally the question remains whether these frequencies calculated within the Karasek model are comparable to other psychosocial job exposure prevalence rates that can theoretically reach 100 % (e.g., the number of subjects working more than 48 h a week). Job strain by definition is one of four categories in the model, resulting from dichotomization of the demand scale and the control scale that can maximally reach 50 %. Also for the estimation of PAFs for ERI, some methodological problems need to be discussed: the risk estimates used to calculate PAFs are based on studies comparing high effort–reward imbalance (upper tertile or quartile) with the baseline quantile (Kuper et al. 2002; Kivimäki et al. 2002). It is questionable whether risk estimates for upper quantiles can be combined with prevalence estimates for effort–reward imbalance above 1 obtained from surveys.