Peptide p18L was therefore chosen as a negative control for subsequent experiments. Figure 2 IFN-γ secretion by PBMC from 3 PPD + healthy donors in the presence of synthetic 20-mer peptides and rPPE44 (ATM inhibitor positive control), as determined by ELISpot.

Individual responses to the peptides are indicated as solid, grey and empty bars. Results are expressed as in Fig. 1A. These results suggested that p1L represents Selleckchem Ilomastat an immunodominant T-cell epitope of protein PPE44. Human T cell responses to p1L peptide The T-cell immune response to p1L was then studied in PPD-, PPD+ and BCG-vaccinated healthy individuals and in patients with active TB by ELISpot and flow cytometry; PPD and ESAT-6 were included as controls. In PPD- healthy donors, practically no IFN-γ-producing cells were observed in response to p1L, PPD and ESAT-6, as expected (Figure 3A). Conversely, all PPD+ healthy donors

(Figure 3B) yielded the highest numbers of IFN-γ-producing cells in response to p1L (13 to 78 spots) and PPD (12 to 58 spots); among the PPD+ healthy donors, 3 out of 5 responded to ESAT-6 (8, 18 and 51 spots, respectively) and one donor responded to control peptide p18L (16 spots) (Figure 3B). A weak IFN-γ response was observed to peptide p1L (11 spots) and antigen ESAT-6 (8 spots) in one of the subjects vaccinated with BCG (Figure 3C); two subjects responded to PPD (22 and 27 spots, respectively) and click here one subject responded to p18L (45 spots). In the 8 patients with active TB (Figure 3D), the response to p1L peptide was absent or very poor, as only one patient produced a number

of IFN-γ-positive spots indicative of an immune response (13 spots). The difference from PPD+ subjects is significant both in terms of proportion of responders and numbers of IFN-γ spots (P < 0.005). Among TB patients, 6 and 4 subjects responded to PPD and ESAT-6, respectively, which is not statistically significant compared to the PPD+ group. Figure 3 IFN-γ secretion by PBMC from PPD - (A), PPD + (B) and BCG-vaccinated (C) healthy donors and from patients with active TB (D) in the presence of p1L, p18L, PPD and ESAT-6, as determined by ELISpot. Baf-A1 nmr Results are expressed as in Fig. 1A. On the whole, results obtained by ICC (Figure 4A-D) were comparable to those obtained by ELISpot and confirmed that most PPD+ patients (60% positivity by ICC versus 100% by ELISpot) had a detectable immune response to p1L peptide, while none of the patients with active TB exhibited a response to p1L peptide. Again, although flow cytometry is less sensitive compared to ELISpot [11], it proves that reacting subjects secrete IFN-γ via their CD4+ T cells. In the responders, the frequency of specific IFN-γ+ T cells was significantly higher than cut-off and reached levels of 0.51%. Among BCG-vaccinated donors, a weak response to p1L was observed in only one donor.