At 8 weeks, this percentage LY2157299 supplier was 52% (ie, 22/42) with a relative risk of shoulder pain in the experimental group of 1.44 (95% CI 0.80 to 2.62), but no significant difference between the groups (χ2 = 1.53, p = 0.217). At follow-up 36% (ie, 13/39) of all participants had shoulder pain. At 8 weeks, participants with shoulder pain showed no significant between-group differences in their responses to the verbal question as well as in the visual graphic rating scale scores on movement and at night. Overall, the pain scores showed inconsistent patterns which

hindered within- and between-group comparisons of those with shoulder pain only. There were no significant betweengroup differences on the Leeds Adult/Arm Spasticity Impact Scale, the Modified Tardieu Scale, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment arm score, and the subluxation scores at endtreatment, as presented in Table 5 (see eAddenda for Table 5). It is of note that all participants with clinically relevant hypertonia also demonstrated a spasticity angle > 0 deg and that Tardieu Scale scores for the internal rotators could not be obtained in a large number of

participants because they had very limited (< 70 deg) total shoulder external rotation range. The overall prevalence of subluxation decreased from baseline (61%) to follow-up (31%). To our knowledge this is the first study to analyse the effects find more of a daily arm stretch positioning procedure combined with simultaneous NMES in patients with a poor prognosis for functional recovery in the subacute phase after stroke. The 8-week high-intensity multimodal intervention Etomidate did not result in any significant differences in arm passive range of motion (contractures), shoulder pain, basic arm activities, hypertonia/spasticity, arm motor control or shoulder subluxation compared to a control group receiving a similar amount of sham positioning combined with TENS in addition to conventional rehabilitation. Previous attempts to maintain hemiplegic arm joint range of motion using static muscle stretching procedures could not prevent considerable loss of shoulder passive range of motion (Ada

et al 2005, Gustafsson and McKenna 2006, de Jong et al 2006, Turton and Britton 2005). Our participants showed similar reductions in mean passive range of motion across most arm joints. Overall, there were no significant differences in passive range of motion between the two groups. At baseline (on average, six weeks post-stroke), 37% of the participants reported (shoulder) pain. During the intervention period, the prevalence increased to 52% and decreased to 36% three months later. These findings are in line with reports that post-stroke shoulder pain is common, affecting 22–64% of cases, particularly patients with poor arm function (Aras et al 2004, Gamble et al 2002, Lindgren et al 2007). Overall, pain severity also increased, particularly on movement and at night.