If task difficulty is used as the indicator for balance exercise intensity, exercise prescription across broad populations Libraries cannot be monitored or graded to ensure training effects for individual patients. If all patients had the same balance capacity at the beginning of a program, then a linear progression in task difficulty through a program may represent an increase in balance exercise intensity for individuals from session to session. Apart from the fact that no group of participants

is ever homogeneous, one would still be left with this dilemma regarding the level at which the exercise intensity was pitched through the program. It would be unclear whether all participants started the balance exercises at a low intensity and stayed low, or started at a moderate intensity and practised high intensity exercises by the end of the intervention. One program see more that explicitly presented a rubric to guide balance exercise intensity prescription was identified (Littbrand et al 2006a). This HIFE program includes a table (p. 8) that defines low, medium, and high intensity exercise prescriptions. For the strength training exercises, the repetition maximum principle is used. For balance exercise a three-point scale ranging from ‘no challenge’

to ‘fully challenged’ postural stability is used. The authors provide a definition for full challenge of postural stability as ‘balance exercises PDK4 performed near the limits of maintaining postural click here stability’ (Littbrand et al 2006a p. 8) This attempt

at standardisation carries some face validity given that repetitive work at the limits of stability is likely to represent an overload, however the ordinal scaling limits the usefulness of this rating of balance exercise intensity. If the level of balance exercise intensity cannot be measured in a reliable and valid way then questions of how hard we need to challenge balance in order to induce improvements in balance cannot be answered. This issue is of particular relevance for the development and implementation of home exercise or unsupervised programs, as it has been found that clinicians often prescribe programs of lower challenge in the home environment compared to supervised situations (Haas et al 2012). While still ordinal in nature, another rating scale that may inform a future measure of balance exercise intensity is the Borg scale. Studies in this review that utilised the Borg scale, also known as the rating of perceived exertion scale, reported the intensity of interventions of mixed exercise types, attributing the rating to the program in its entirety (Means et al 2005, Nelson et al 2004, Pereira et al 2008).